There are certainly a large amount of websites out there that use the word "future" within their domain name, but are they really futurist type websites? It is recommended often by print publishers and editors that the term "future" is a good word to used in titles, as it grabs people's attention. But, when people use the word future and then don't give predictions or future accounts, then are they really deceiving the viewer and web-surfer. I believe they are.
Recently, an editor of a future of things type website asked me to create a column, in reviewing the internet site I discovered it to be underwhelming on the futuristic side of things, and more heavy into the scientific news arena. Indeed, if the magazine is intent on "The Future" then why are all the articles about new scientific innovations in the current period or happening at this time? - asked myself.
www.chatrush.com
raadpleger.nl
https://678-hd.com/
www.naiwaennet.com
It seems like they are intent on scientific discovery that has already happened, not what'll take the future. That is just boring, more science news, regurgitation, typical human tactic of re-packaging information. I do believe they can do better, but are holding themselves back, afraid to create people think, worried that you will get past an acceptable limit from your mainstream, quote "core" band of viewers, which I believe they do not even understand.
Obviously, being an entrepreneur, I know why they get it done this way. It is basically because they wish to generate income and thus sink to a lesser amount of readership, while still pretending to share with you the future of stuff. When the editor wished to protect such comments, the indication was that the site was mostly about scientific news.
Yes, I notice that the site is certainly caused by a news site and I ask what does that have to do with the future of stuff? Shouldn't the internet site be called NSIN.com or something that way; for New Science Innovation News? If the site is approximately Science News and is an accumulation everyone else's news, then it is really a copy site of a variety that's already used and not unique. Thus, the information is therefore the same, so even when the articles are written more clearly and easier to comprehend, which can be nice, still what is the worth to a "science news junky" as you can find hardly any articles on the internet site compared using their competition?
Should they called them selves a news site, then you might have "futurist type columnists" anyway, who might project these scientific news items into the long run or they may keep carefully the "Future Stuff" motif and promote the futurist columnists.
This would be a lesson to all "Futuristic" type websites as an instance study. If you take the long run thinkers to your website and have nothing to show them, they will leave. If you are using trickery to get regular readers there, you're doing a significant disservice to the future of mankind, by promoting present inventions because the be all end all. In any event, it's unethical to make use of this tactic on future of things type websites.
No comments:
Post a Comment